BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Melbourne v. The Ministry of Defence [2000] UKEAT 522_00_2811 (28 November 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/522_00_2811.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 522__2811, [2000] UKEAT 522_00_2811

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 522_00_2811
Appeal No. EAT/522/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 28 November 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE H WILSON

MR I EZEKIEL

MR H SINGH



MR J L MELBOURNE APPELLANT

THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR R MELLO
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed by:
    Mr S Aktar
    Commission for Racial Equality
    Legal Services Dept
    3rd Floor, Lancaster House
    67 Newhall Street
    Birmingham B3 1NA
       


     

    JUDGE H WILSON

  1. This has been the preliminary hearing of the proposed appeal by the original Applicant against the finding of the Employment Tribunal sitting at Cardiff that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear his complaints of unfair dismissal and race discrimination, with the result that his application was struck out.
  2. The position is that the Applicant was the best army recruit in 1996, but after that achievement, was the subject of discrimination, about which he complained in 1998. He was court-martialled, although he got a letter of apology from the Chief of Staff, General Sir Michael Walker.
  3. Those are the brief background facts and we have been assisted today by the Skeleton Argument from Mr D Mello, who has appeared on behalf of the Applicant, and who states the two issues with commendable succinctness In our view the matter should go forward on both those grounds for full hearing, Category A to be tried by the President, or another High Court Judge with a time estimate of 3 hours.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/522_00_2811.html