BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Hobson v. Hi-Way Express & Ors [2001] UKEAT 0892_01_2409 (24 September 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/0892_01_2409.html
Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 892_1_2409, [2001] UKEAT 0892_01_2409

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2001] UKEAT 0892_01_2409
Appeal No. EAT/0892/01

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 24 September 2001

Before

MR RECORDER LANGSTAFF QC

MR P DAWSON OBE

MR B V FITZGERALD



MR C R HOBSON APPELLANT

(1) HI-WAY EXPRESS
(2) MR S E CARTER
(3) MR K B CARTER
RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING EX PARTE

© Copyright 2001


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant NO APPEARANCE OR
    REPRESENTATION BY OR
    ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT
       


     

    MR RECORDER LANGSTAFF QC

  1. This is a Preliminary Hearing in an appeal in which Mr Hobson intends to pursue against a decision of the Employment Tribunal at Leeds. We have earlier this morning heard an intended appeal by Mr S E Carter arising out of the same decision. We have identified and given permission for 3 grounds of appeal to be argued in his case.
  2. Mr Hobson has not appeared before us today. We had therefore to decide whether we intend to hear and determine his appeal in his absence. We think it appropriate to decline our discretion to do so. The matter should be re-listed. It should be re-listed once Mr Hobson has had an opportunity to consider what has been said in the case of Mr Carter, to have considered the amended Notice of Appeal in Mr Carter's case and to have turned his mind as to whether any, or indeed all, of those ground may equally be applicable in his case. Once he has had an opportunity to consider those and to consider the present Notice of Appeal as it stands, this matter should then be listed for a further Preliminary Hearing.
  3. We would anticipate that it should therefore not be listed within a period of one month from today but at a convenient date thereafter.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/0892_01_2409.html