BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Hagag v. Metropole Hotel (Holdings) Ltd. [2001] UKEAT 1246_00_2704 (27 April 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1246_00_2704.html
Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 1246__2704, [2001] UKEAT 1246_00_2704

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2001] UKEAT 1246_00_2704
Appeal No. EAT/1246/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 27 April 2001

Before

HER HONOUR JUDGE A WAKEFIELD

MRS D M PALMER

MR G H WRIGHT MBE



MR J HAGAG APPELLANT

METROPOLE HOTEL (HOLDINGS) LTD. RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2001


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant No appearance or
    representation by or
    on behalf of the Appellant
       


     

  1. This is an ex-parte preliminary hearing of an appeal by Mr Hagag, in order to determine whether the case shows sufficient grounds for the matter to proceed to a full hearing. Once again, the Applicant is not represented, and the matter is dealt with on the basis of the documentation.
  2. The appeal is against the Decision of the Brighton Employment Tribunal, given on 6 July 2000 by which the complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed, firstly on the basis that the Appellant had only been employed between September 1999 and March 2000 and therefore had an insufficient period of employment to found a claim of unfair dismissal and secondly that he had not in any event been dismissed, but had resigned.
  3. The Notice of Appeal sets out as the ground for challenge of that Decision that the end of the employment was a result of dismissal and not resignation. Again, we are satisfied that the Employment Tribunal properly took account of the evidence before it, and reached an unassailable conclusion in the light of that evidence. No point of law arises to require a full hearing. The appeal is dismissed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1246_00_2704.html