BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Ketwaroo v. John Laing Services Ltd [2002] UKEAT 1293_01_0205 (2 May 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/1293_01_0205.html
Cite as: [2002] UKEAT 1293_01_0205, [2002] UKEAT 1293_1_205

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2002] UKEAT 1293_01_0205
Appeal No. EAT/1293/01

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 2 May 2002

Before

HER HONOUR JUDGE A WAKEFIELD

MR P R A JACQUES CBE

MRS R A VICKERS



MRS R D KETWAROO APPELLANT

JOHN LAING SERVICES LTD RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2002


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR R FREER
    (Solicitor)
    Messrs Pattinson & Brewer
    Solicitors
    71 Kingsway
    London
    WC2B 6ST
       


     

    HER HONOUR JUDGE A WAKEFIELD

  1. This is an Ex Parte Preliminary Hearing of an appeal by Mrs Ketwaroo against the decision of an Employment Tribunal sitting at Watford by which, at an Interlocutory Hearing, she was ordered to pay within forty two days the costs of the Respondent in the sum of £750.00 plus VAT. This sum comprised in part the solicitors costs of the Respondent of work done prior to the interlocutory hearing and in part the fees of Counsel and the costs of the solicitor attending that hearing on behalf of the Respondent.
  2. The grounds of the appeal are that the award of costs against the Appellant was perverse, in view of the fact that at the interlocutory hearing an application to strike out the originating application was in fact unsuccessful and, it is argued, the interlocutory hearing would have had to take place in any event regardless of any such application being due to be heard.
  3. In all the circumstances and having regard to the arguments put forward to us today we consider that this matter should go forward to a full hearing. We put it in Category C. Time Estimate – 2 hours.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/1293_01_0205.html