BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Johnson v. Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust [2002] UKEAT 1331_01_0708 (7 August 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/1331_01_0708.html
Cite as: [2002] UKEAT 1331_01_0708, [2002] UKEAT 1331_1_708

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2002] UKEAT 1331_01_0708
Appeal No. EAT/1331/01

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 7 August 2002

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D SEROTA QC

MS H PITCHER

MRS M T PROSSER



MISS I JOHNSON APPELLANT

1) QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL NHS TRUST RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2002


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR J GALBRAITH MARTIN
    APPEARING UNDER THE EMPLOYMENT LAW APPEAL ADVICE SCHEME
       


     

    JUDGE D SEROTA QC

  1. This is an appeal by Miss I Johnson against a decision of the Employment Tribunal at London (South) of 23 & 24 April 2001 and 14 May 2001 (as in Chambers).
  2. We have been referred to the decision of the European Court of Justice in the case of Burn v Reinfield and it is certainly arguable that there has been direct discrimination in this case. If the twelve month period of inactivity (which provided the justification for dismissal) includes a period of pregnancy leave then it seems fairly arguable that there was direct discrimination. We express no views as to the strength of this argument. It seems to us that it is fairly arguable and should go to a full appeal but we are only prepared to allow this appeal to proceed on that basis.
  3. The appeal will proceed against the first Respondent alone. It will proceed only on the basis of the amended ground of appeal and that should be formally lodged within 14 days from today and we will also direct that both parties should serve Skeleton Arguments, together with copies of all authorities relied upon, not less than 14 days before the date of the hearing.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/1331_01_0708.html