BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) >> Stalker v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors [2024] UKFTT 552 (GRC) (19 June 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/GRC/2024/552.html Cite as: [2024] UKFTT 552 (GRC) |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
NCN: [2024] UKFTT 552 (GRC)
Case Reference: D/2024/0058
First-tier Tribunal
General Regulatory Chamber
Transport
Papers on 19th June 2024
Before
HHJ DAVID DIXON
Between
MARK STALKER
Appellant
and
THE REGISTRAR OF APPROVED
DRIVING INSTRUCTORS
Respondent
Decision: The appeal is withdrawn.
REASONS
Background to Appeal
1. This appeal concerns a decision of the Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors ("the Registrar") made 29th December 2023 to refuse to grant the Appellant a third trainee licence.
2. The Appellant was a trainee driving instructor who was granted a trainee licence under s.129 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 [1] ('the Act') for a six-month period, and then another, but was refused a further licence at the end of the relevant period.
3. The Registrar's reasons for refusal, in summary, were that the Appellant had not passed the final part of the ADI qualifying examination within the relevant period and as insufficient evidence of loss of training time was supplied that the Appellant had had long enough to progress, and the application to issue a third trainee licence was therefore refused.
4. The Appellant initially appealed the Registrar's decision, however by email on 18th June 2024 the Appellant indicated that he had been successful in his recent Part 3 examination and therefore was now fully qualified. He no longer required a further licence and the application was therefore withdrawn.
5. The Tribunal agreed the request to withdraw and wishes the Appellant well in his qualified status.