BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) >> Hands v Information Commissioner [2024] UKFTT 86 (GRC) (25 January 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/GRC/2024/86.html
Cite as: [2024] UKFTT 86 (GRC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2024] UKFTT 86 (GRC)
Case Reference: EA-2023-0469

First-tier Tribunal
General Regulatory Chamber
Information Rights

25 January 2024

B e f o r e :

TRIBUNAL JUDGE BUCKLEY
____________________

Between:
M HANDS
Appellant
- and -

THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
Respondent

____________________

JUDGE BUCKLEY
Sitting in Chambers
on 16 January 2024

____________________

HTML VERSION OF DECISION
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

    DECISION

  1. The appeal is struck out.
  2. REASONS

  3. The appeal is brought against a decision of the Scottish Information Commissioner in relation to the Freedom on Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) and the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004.
  4. The Registrar made case management directions on 18 December 2023 which gave the appellant the opportunity, by no later than 8 January 2024, to state the legislation on which they rely to say that this tribunal has jurisdiction or to make representations as to why the appeal should not be struck out. No representations or any response has been received.
  5. The First-tier Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal against a decision of the Scottish Information Commissioner. Under section 56 FOISA an appeal against a decision of the Scottish Information Commissioner must be made to the Court of Session. This is stated in the decision notice against which the appellant is attempting to appeal.
  6. The appellant was given the opportunity to make representations on why the appeal should not be struck out for want of jurisdiction but did not make any representations. Accordingly, I do not know whether the appellant would wish to pursue proceedings in the Court of Session. The expenses regime in the Court of Session is very different to the costs regime in the information rights tribunal. For those reasons it is not appropriate to exercise the tribunal's power under rule 5(3)(k)(i) to transfer the proceedings to the Court of Session.
  7. On that basis the appeal is struck out under rule 8(2)(a) because the tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
  8. Signed Sophie Buckley

    Judge of the First-tier Tribunal

    Date: 25 January 2024


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/GRC/2024/86.html