First-tier Tribunal (Tax)

[2011] UKFTT 753 (TC)

TC01590

 

Appeal number: TC/2011/04808

 

Penalties – failure to submit personal Tax Return – reasonable excuse – Appeal allowed.

 

 

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL

 

TAX

 

 

 

STEPHEN CHARD Appellant

 

 

- and -

 

 

THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY’S

REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

 

 

 

 

TRIBUNAL: LADY MITTING (TRIBUNAL JUDGE)

 

The Tribunal determined the appeal on 28 October 2011 without a hearing under the provisions of Rule 26 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (default paper cases) having first read the Notice of Appeal dated 28 June 2011 and HMRC’s Statement of Case submitted on 29 July 2011.

 

 

 

 

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2011

DECISION

 

 

1.       Mr Chard appeals against a penalty in the sum of £100 issued on or around 15 February 2011 for his failure to submit his Tax Return for the year ended 5 April 2010.  Mr Chard submitted his Returns on line and HMRC sent out to him a notice to file on 6 April 2010.  The filing dates were 31 October 2010 for a paper Return or 31 January 2011 if filed on line.  The Commissioners received a paper return on 2 March 2011.  Their penalty notice was issued on or a few days after 15 February 2011.

2.       Mr Chard’s case is quite simply that he did not receive the notice to file.  I understand that Mr Chard has filed on line since 2005/06.  He asserts, and this is not challenged by the Commissioners, that all previous Returns have always been filed on time.

3.       I accept that the Notice was sent out by the Commissioners but post does occasionally go astray and when Mr Chard maintains that he did not receive the Notice I accept that as a truthful statement and find as a fact that he did not.  I am influenced in making this finding by the fact that he has never defaulted in submitting his Returns before and that he submitted this Return within three days of receiving the penalty.

4.       A taxpayer’s obligation is to deliver a return of his income when required to do so by being sent a Notice to file.  The obligation arises out of receipt of the Notice.  Having found as a fact that Mr Chard did not receive the Notice, I find that he has a reasonable excuse for the non-submission of the Return and I therefore allow the appeal.

5.       This document contains full findings of fact and reasons for the decision. Any party dissatisfied with this decision has a right to apply for permission to appeal against it pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009. The application must be received by this Tribunal not later than 56 days after this decision is sent to that party.  The parties are referred to “Guidance to accompany a Decision from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)” which accompanies and forms part of this decision notice.

 

 

 

TRIBUNAL JUDGE

 

 

RELEASE DATE: 21 November 2011

 

 

 

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2011