BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
First-tier Tribunal (Tax) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Tax) >> Astrid Koyeni-Efreeitems (Partnership) v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 13 (TC) (04 January 2012) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2012/TC01712.html Cite as: [2012] UKFTT 13 (TC) |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[2012] UKFTT 13 (TC)
TC01712
Appeal number: TC/2011/05160
Section 93A (2) Taxes Management Act 1970 – late filing of partnership return – paper return 94 days late – Appellant says unable to file partnership return online as requisite software unavailable unless commercial software purchased – no reasonable excuse – appeal disallowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
TAX
ASTRID KOYENI – EFREEITEMS (PARTNERSHIP) Appellant
- and -
TRIBUNAL: MICHAEL S CONNELL (TRIBUNAL JUDGE)
The Tribunal determined the appeal on 9 November 2011 without a hearing under the provisions of Rule 26 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (default paper cases) having first read the Notice of Appeal dated 5 May 2011 and HMRC’s Statement of Case submitted on 26 August 2011.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2011
DECISION
Facts of the Appeal
4.(i) The return for the year ending 5 April 2010 was issued to the partnership on 6 April 2010.
4.(ii) The filing date was 31 October 2010 for a paper return or 31 January 2011 if filed online.
4.(iii) A paper partnership tax return for the year ended 5 April 2010 was filed on 2 February 2011.
4.(iv) Penalties in the amount of £100 were imposed on each partner for failure to file the 2009/10 partnership tax return by the filing deadline.
HMRC’s submissions
5. The filing date for the partnership was 31 October 2010 for a paper return but the return was not filed until 2 February 2011. The Appellant had the option to file a return online by 31 January 2011.
6. The filing dates and the consequences of missing them are shown on the front of the partnership return. This information is also available on HMRC’s website. In this instance the partnership return was issued on 6 April 2010, substantially in advance of both paper and online filing dates.
7. HMRC submit that the period of default is from 31 October 2010 until 1 February 2011, that is 94 days.
Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal
8.(i) The Appellant’s agent states that the return was submitted to HMRC on 31 January 2011.
8.(ii) The Appellant’s agent also states that online filing was not available for partnership returns for the year ended 5 April 2010.
8.(iii) The Appellant’s agent submts that the partnership did not incur any taxation liabilities for the year, and in fact made a loss in 2009/10. The agent contends that the penalties should be reduced to the figure of any unpaid liability, with the result that the penalties should be nil.
HMRC’s response
9. Following the introduction of online filing for self-assessment third party commercial software has been required in order to file partnership returns. This is not a new requirement. HMRC is not obliged to provide free software to enable tax-payers to file their returns online. Free HMRC software is available, but only covers personal tax returns and some supplementary pages. Tax-payers who need to complete other returns online, and in this case a partnership tax return, must use commercial software. HMRC’s website advises that commercial software is required and provides a list of commercial software compatible with HMRC’s self-assessment online.
10. HMRC therefore contend that it was the responsibility of the nominated partner to ensure the return was filed on time. The return guidance contains details of the deadlines and consequences of missing the deadlines, and consequently the Appellant has not shown a reasonable excuse for failing to file the 2009/10 partnership tax return by the filing deadline, which was entirely within the control of the nominated partner.
Conclusion
11. It is reasonable to expect a business person or its agent to exercise due diligence and a proper regard for compliance with their tax obligations. A notice to file a return was correctly issued and it was the responsibility of the partnership to ensure that the return was filed on time.
12. Clearly the tax return was not submitted to HMRC online on 31 January 2011 as contended by the Appellant. A paper return was received on 2 February 2011, 94 days after the paper filing deadline of 31 October 2010. It is incorrect for the Appellant to say that online filing was not available for partnership returns for the year ended 5 April 2010. Online filing for partnership returns was available using appropriate commercial software. Although the partnership made a loss during 2009/10 the penalty cannot be reduced to nil (because any unpaid liability to tax is less than the penalty payable) as this does not apply to partnership late filing penalties.
13. In all the circumstances the Appellant has not provided a reasonable excuse for failing to file the partnership’s 2009/10 tax return by the filing deadline and penalties have been correctly charged on each partner.
