Department of Health (Decision Notice) [2009] UKICO FS50088736 (29 January 2009)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Department of Health (Decision Notice) [2009] UKICO FS50088736 (29 January 2009)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2009/FS50088736.html
Cite as: [2009] UKICO FS50088736

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Department of Health (Decision Notice) [2009] UKICO FS50088736 (29 January 2009)

Summary: The complainant requested a copy of a contract agreed by the public authority for the provision of a national broadband network under the NHS National Programme for IT with certain information removed. The public authority initially refused to disclose the contract under sections 12 (cost of compliance exceeds the appropriate limit) and 43(2) (prejudice to commercial interests) of the Act. It subsequently also sought to rely on sections 40(2) (personal information) and 41 (information provided in confidence). During the course of the investigation, the complainant accepted the public authority-™s application of section 40(2) to certain information in the contract. The Commissioner determined that sections 12, 41 and 43(2) were not applicable and ordered that a redacted version of the contract be disclosed to the complainant. He also found that the public authority had not complied with section 1(1)(b), as it did not provide the requested information by the time of the completion of the internal review, and section 10(1), as it did not provide the requested information within 20 working days of the request. In addition, it breached section 17(1)(b) and (c), as it failed to state in its refusal notice that it believed that sections 40(2) and 41 were applicable to the information requested nor explain why they applied.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 12 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld, FOI 41 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 43 - Complaint Upheld

A HTML version of this file is not available click here to view the whole pdf version : [2009] UKICO FS50088736


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2009/FS50088736.html