Ministry of Justice (Decision Notice) [2009] UKICO FS50099274 (09 March 2009)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Ministry of Justice (Decision Notice) [2009] UKICO FS50099274 (09 March 2009)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2009/FS50099274.html
Cite as: [2009] UKICO FS50099274

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Ministry of Justice (Decision Notice) [2009] UKICO FS50099274 (09 March 2009)

Summary: The complainant requested details of compensation awards made to each of a list of named individuals for miscarriage of justice claims. The public authority refused the request on the basis that sections 40(2) (third party information) and 41 (information provided in confidence) applied as it was personal data and was also held on the understanding that the contents would remain confidential. It further held that section 12 (cost of compliance exceeds appropriate limit) applied, as to locate, extract and redact the information in some of the cases would exceed the appropriate limit. The Commissioner finds that in all cases the information requested would be the personal data of either those named individuals or other named parties and that to confirm or deny the information it held would in itself breach the first data protection principle. The public authority should therefore have cited section 40(5)(b)(i) and declined to confirm or deny whether it held any of the requested information. The public authority-™s refusal notice did not refer to the sub-section of the exemption claimed. The Commissioner therefore finds that it breached section 17(1)(b) by introducing the relevant sub-section outside the statutory 20 working day period.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld

A HTML version of this file is not available click here to view the whole pdf version : [2009] UKICO FS50099274


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2009/FS50099274.html