BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Cabinet Office (Decision Notice) [2011] UKICO FS50318536 (17 March 2011) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2011/FS50318536.html Cite as: [2011] UKICO FS50318536 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Summary: The complainant asked the public authority to provide information about communications sent or received by a specified individual and their line manager and direct or indirect reports in relation to the company Phorm. Although the Cabinet Office initially confirmed it held some requested information to which it applied the exemption at section 27(1)(b) (prejudice to international relations), it subsequently issued a refusal notice citing section 14 (vexatious requests), and at the internal review stage it stated that it held no information. During the Commissioner-™s investigation the public authority sought to rely on the exemption provided by section 40(5)(b)(i), stating that it should instead have given a -˜neither confirm nor deny-™ response. The Commissioner finds that section 40(5)(b)(i) does not apply and that the public authority should now confirm or deny whether it holds the requested information or apply an appropriate exemption. The Commissioner also finds that the public authority did not comply with all of its procedural obligations under the Act.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld
