Sussex Police (Police and criminal justice) [2018] UKICO fs50706898 (11 June 2018)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Sussex Police (Police and criminal justice) [2018] UKICO fs50706898 (11 June 2018)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2018/fs50706898.html
Cite as: [2018] UKICO fs50706898

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Sussex Police

The complainant requested information on the seizure and processing of digital devices. Sussex Police disclosed some information and said that it did not hold information about instances in which the results of individual forensic examinations were used to prosecute device owners. The complainant challenged this assertion. The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities, Sussex Police does hold the requested information. She also found that by failing to respond to the request within the statutory 20 working day timescale, Sussex Police breached section 1 and section 10 of the FOIA. The Commissioner requires Sussex Police to issue a fresh response to the request to know, for the periods specified by the complainant, in how many instances the results of forensic examinations were used to prosecute the device owner. The fresh response should not rely on a claim that the requested information is not held.

FOI 10: Complaint upheld FOI 1: Complaint upheld

Decision notice: fs50706898


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2018/fs50706898.html