Canterbury City Council (Local government) [2022] UKICO 91020 (8 September 2022)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Canterbury City Council (Local government) [2022] UKICO 91020 (8 September 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/91020.html
Cite as: [2022] UKICO 91020

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Canterbury City Council

The complainant requested a wide range of information relating to stray dogs. Canterbury City Council (the “council”) disclosed some information. It withheld other information under the exemptions for health and safety (section 38), information provided in confidence (section 41) and commercial interests (section 43(2)). During the Commissioner’s investigation the council dropped its reliance on exemptions and disclosed the outstanding information. The Commissioner’s decision is that the council disclosed all the relevant information that it holds and complied with section 1(1) but that it disclosed the information outside the time for compliance and breached section 10(1). The Commissioner does not require the council to take any steps.

FOI 1(1): Complaint not upheld FOI 10(1): Complaint upheld

Decision notice: 91020

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/91020.html