Home Office (Central government) [2023] UKICO 227894 (11 July 2023)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Home Office (Central government) [2023] UKICO 227894 (11 July 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2023/227894.html
Cite as: [2023] UKICO 227894

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Home Office

The complainant has requested copies of any viability assessments and related correspondence on reported plans to use two holiday camps to house asylum seekers. The Home Office would neither confirm nor deny holding the information, citing section 38(2) (Health and safety) of FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Home Office was not entitled to rely on section 38(2) to refuse to confirm or deny whether it holds any information falling within the scope of the request. The Commissioner requires the Home Office to confirm or deny that it holds any information falling within the scope of the request. If it does hold information, either this information should be disclosed in accordance with section 1(1)(b) of FOIA, or the Home Office should explain the exemption(s) being relied upon to withhold it, in accordance with its obligations under section 17 of FOIA.

FOI 38: Complaint upheld

Decision notice: 227894


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2023/227894.html