St Neots Surgery (Health) [2023] UKICO 233252 (9 June 2023)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> St Neots Surgery (Health) [2023] UKICO 233252 (9 June 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2023/233252.html
Cite as: [2023] UKICO 233252

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


St Neots Surgery

The complainant has requested information associated with the death of their relative. The Commissioner finds that St Neots Surgery (‘the Surgery’) doesn’t hold the requested autopsy report and complied with section 1(1) of FOIA in respect of that report and two other reports the complainant requested. However, the Surgery disclosed some of the requested statistical information for the period 2018 to 2021 and advised it didn’t hold earlier information. It has now identified it holds further relevant statistical information for the period from 2013/2014. The Commissioner’s final decision is therefore that the Surgery has breached section 1(1) of FOIA as it hasn’t communicated all the relevant information it holds. The Surgery responded to the request outside the 20-working day requirement and so also breached section 10(1).The Commissioner requires the Surgery to take the following step to ensure compliance with the legislation: Provide the complainant with the further relevant statistical information it has identified it holds for the period from 2013/2014.

FOI 10: Complaint upheld FOI 1: Complaint upheld

Decision notice: 233252


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2023/233252.html