BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> GOLF COURTS (Trade Mark: Rectification) [2001] UKIntelP o34201 (9 August 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o34201.html Cite as: [2001] UKIntelP o34201 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o34201
Result
Section 60(3)(b) - Application failed
Points Of Interest
Summary
The applicant applied on the sole ground under Section 60(3)(b) to have his name substituted for that of the registered proprietor. Section 60(3)(b) requires that the applicant be the proprietor of the mark at issue in a Convention Country before substitution can be considered. The Hearing Officer determined that proprietorship need not be only by way of registration in a Convention Country though that was one way of proving proprietorship. Evidence of use in trade would appear to be another (Footnote 47 of Chapter 13.190 of the thirteen edition of Kerly’s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names).
In this case the applicants evidence failed to prove proprietorship in a Convention Country and the Hearing Officer concluded that this application under Section 60(3)(b) must fail at the outset.