BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> PARETO (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2001] UKIntelP o47201 (30 October 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o47201.html
Cite as: [2001] UKIntelP o47201

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


PARETO (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2001] UKIntelP o47201 (30 October 2001)

For the whole decision click here: o47201

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/472/01
Decision date
30 October 2001
Hearing officer
Mr D Morgan
Mark
PARETO
Classes
35
Applicant
Pareto Services Limited
Opponent
Pareto Partners (A Partnership)
Opposition
Section 5(2)(b)

Result

Sections 5(2)(b) - Opposition partially successful

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opponents opposition was based on their ownership of a registration of the mark PARETO in Class 36 in respect of, essentially, financial services. They also had extensive use of their PARETO mark in relation to services of a specialist institutional investment manager.

Under Section 5(2) the Hearing Officer compared the respective marks and decided that they were confusingly similar. He also concluded that there were similar services at issue in the respective specifications and therefore the opponents were successful in their opposition under Section 5(2)(b). However, not all the applicants claimed services were in conflict with those of the opponent and the Hearing Officer allowed the application to proceed for a restricted specification.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o47201.html