BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> CD CARD (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2002] UKIntelP o17202 (19 April 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o17202.html
Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o17202

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


CD CARD (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2002] UKIntelP o17202 (19 April 2002)

For the whole decision click here: o17202

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/172/02
Decision date
19 April 2002
Hearing officer
Mr J MacGillivray
Mark
CD CARD
Classes
16
Registered Proprietor
Tabak Marketing Limited
Applicants for Declaration of Invalidity
Michael Robin Markwell Limited
Application for Invalidation
Sections 47(1) (Sections 3(1)(b), 3(1)(c); 3(1)(d) & 3(6))

Result

Application for invalidation Section 47(1) successful

Points Of Interest

Summary

This was one of two related actions against this registration (see also BL O/173/02). Having examined the prima facie case against the mark the Hearing Officer concluded that it comprised "two obvious and highly descriptive elements conjoined and that in its totality the mark may serve in normal usage from a customer's point of view to designate the kind of goods concerned (greetings cards incorporating compact discs) in a natural way."

The mark therefore did not meet the requirements of Section 3(1)(c) of the Act and thus failed also under Section 3(1)(b).

The Hearing Officer went on to consider the matter under the proviso to Section 3(1). He concluded, however, that the evidence filed did not show that the mark had acquired a distinctive character either before registration or since. The application for invalidation under Section 47(1) therefore succeeded by virtue of Sections 3(1)(b) and (c) of the Act.

He did not go on to consider the matter under the other grounds cited.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o17202.html