BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> THREE SIX SIX THREE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o18502 (30 April 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o18502.html
Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o18502

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


THREE SIX SIX THREE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o18502 (30 April 2002)

For the whole decision click here: o18502

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/185/02
Decision date
30 April 2002
Hearing officer
Mr M Knight
Mark
THREE SIX SIX THREE
Classes
29, 30, 31, 39, 42
Applicant
BFS Group Limited
Opponent
Woodward Foodservice Limited
Opposition
Sections 3(1)(b) & 3(1)(c)* * other sections were cited but dropped at the last minute

Result

Section 3(1)(b) - Opposition failed

Section 3(1)(c) - Opposition failed

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opposition was based on the fact that the numbers 3663 spell 'food' on a touch tone telephone key pad. To the Hearing Officer, however, it seemed that the numbers and the words on their own were not ones which would be used by themselves to indicate the telephone number of their food supplier or supplier of related services, and they had some distinctive character. Neither did they of themselves indicate anything within the relevant trade which would render them objectionable under Section 3(1)(c). The objections were therefore dismissed. The Hearing Officer made an award of costs which took account of wasted work in respect of the abandoned grounds.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o18502.html