BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Mr James Anthony Barry (Patent) [2002] UKIntelP o24902 (19 June 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o24902.html Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o24902 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o24902
Summary
The difficulties the proprietor was experiencing during the period in which the ninth year renewal fee could have been paid were not such as to prevent or absolve him from taking reasonable care to see that the fee was paid after receiving renewal reminders from his patent agent. It was clear that he was capable of carrying on a number of demanding activities at the time the fee could have been paid. The fact that he chose to file the agents reminders away, without having any system to bring them to his attention later, suggests that he did not give patent renewal payments the same degree of care as the other activities with which he was preoccupied. The Hearing Officer refused to allow the request for restoration.
