BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> PENNY BLACK (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o37802 (6 September 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o37802.html
Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o37802

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


PENNY BLACK (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o37802 (6 September 2002)

For the whole decision click here: o37802

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/378/02
Decision date
6 September 2002
Hearing officer
Professor Ruth Annand
Mark
PENNY BLACK
Classes
18
Applicants/Respondents
Mr & Mrs Aldridge
Opponents/Appellants
Max Mara Fashion Group S.R.L.
Appeal to the Appointed Person against the decision of the Registrar’s Hearing Officer in Opposition Proceedings

Result

Hearing Officer’s decision set aside; matter remitted to Registrar for further consideration.

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opponents appealed against the Hearing Officer’s decision of 25 September 2001 (see BL O/415/01) by which he had allowed the applications to proceed subject to certain deletions from the specification.

However, it emerged that the examination stage had resulted in a reclassification of some of the goods (bags and belts) and a consequent change in the application, from Class 25 as originally filed, to Class 18.

The Appointed Person notified the parties that she wished to be addressed on the subject of this reclassification, in the light of a recent Court of Appeal decision (Reliance Water Controls Ltd v Altecnic Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1928, 12 December 2001), which, in essence, barred reclassification of an application if the goods appeared in the Class originally cited as well as the Class to which a transfer was proposed (Section 39(2)).

Having reviewed the facts the Appointed Person decided that the examiner had acted ultra vires in allowing the move from Class 25 to Class 18. Hence, the Hearing Officer’s decision was to be set aside and the matter remitted to the Registrar for further consideration of the classification issue.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o37802.html