BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> AJLAN BROS (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o27703 (3 September 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o27703.html
Cite as: [2003] UKIntelP o27703

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


AJLAN BROS (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o27703 (3 September 2003)

For the whole decision click here: o27703

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/277/03
Decision date
3 September 2003
Hearing officer
Dr W J Trott
Mark
AJLAN & BROS
Classes
25
Applicant
Ajlan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Ajan & Brothers Co
Opponent
Lappet Manufacturing Co Limited
Opposition
Sections 3(1)(b), 3(6) & 5(2)(b)* (*other grounds were cited but not pursued and so dismissed)

Result

Section 3(1)(b) - Opposition failed.

Section 3(6) - Opposition failed.

Section 5(2)(b): - Opposition failed.

Points Of Interest

Summary

Under Section 3(1)(b) the Hearing Officer, having had regard to all the submissions made, and to the earlier jurisprudence, could find no objections to the mark.

The objection under Section 3(6), originally stated as an allegation of ‘bad faith’, turned out at the hearing to be an allegation that the applicants intended to use the mark in relation to one product only of those, in the specification, and also did not intend to use the mark in the UK.

The Hearing Officer found no evidence of bad faith, and noted that flaws in the applicants’ evidence were perhaps attributable to the fact that the evidence was not directed at the precise allegations which had emerged. The Section 3(6) ground was dismissed.

Finally, the Hearing Officer turned to consider the matter under Section 5(2)(b). The opponents’ mark comprised a circular device with Arabic script above and the word/letters AJLN below. The Hearing Officer concluded that these marks differed one from the other to such an extent that there was no likelihood of confusion.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o27703.html