BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> METS (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o35603 (19 November 2003) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o35603.html Cite as: [2003] UKIntelP o35603 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o35603
Result
Section 5(2)(b): - Opposition successful.
Section 5(4)(a): - Opposition failed.
Points Of Interest
Summary
This opposition was one of two related oppositions; the other is set out in BL O/355/03). The marks cited by the opponent were MET OFFICE & MET (the latter being a CTM application).
It was common ground that the goods were similar.
The Hearing Officer therefore went on to make an assessment of the marks. As in the related decision (BL O/355/03) he found no likelihood of confusion in the case of the opponent’s MET OFFICE mark. His finding was different, however, in the case of the MET mark.
The mark applied for had a degree of stylisation but it was very slight.
The oppositions under Section 5(2)(b) succeeded therefore, subject to the eventual registration of the opponent’s CTM application.
The evidence did not support the opposition under Section 5(4)(a); this ground failed.
The question of costs would be considered after the receipt of written submissions.
