BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> TESCO WE SELL FOR LESS (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o36103 (24 November 2003) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o36103.html Cite as: [2003] UKIntelP o36103 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o36103
Result
Section 4(6) - Opposition successful.
Points Of Interest
Summary
The opponents alleged that the applicants, aware of the opponents' interest in the mark applied for, wished merely to prevent their use of it and had no valid intention of using the mark in respect of goods or services.
Prior to hearing the substantive issue the Hearing Officer refused an application to allow evidence filed in related proceedings (see BL O/362/03) to be admitted to these proceedings.
The Hearing Officer, whilst accepting that the applicants' adoption of this and other marks was not coincidental, nevertheless did not agree that this was proof of bad faith. He went on to consider the other leg of the objection, that there was an absence of a bona fide intention to use the mark on the goods/services specified. In this, the applicants' own evidence showed that they regarded the marks as "a common business slogan", they applied for it to prevent the opponents from "buying up the English language", and were using it as a strap-line, to promote the business as a whole.
This second leg of the objection succeeded accordingly.
