BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> SO?...KISS ME (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2004] UKIntelP o13404 (13 May 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o13404.html
Cite as: [2004] UKIntelP o13404

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SO?...KISS ME (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2004] UKIntelP o13404 (13 May 2004)

For the whole decision click here: o13404

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/134/04
Decision date
13 May 2004
Hearing officer
Dr W J Trott
Mark
SO?...KISS ME
Classes
03
Applicant
Debonair Trading Internacional
Opponent
Kabushiki Kaisha Isehan
Opposition
Section 5(4)(a)

Result

Section 5(4)(a) - Opposition failed.

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opponent claimed use of the mark KISS ME in relation to 'mascara' from 1975 on goods imported from America. The only evidence of use provided was the provision of a ‘typical invoice’ originating in the UK, totaling $27 and information about the nature of the product, in particular that it was water resistant.

The opponent also claims promotion in the UK from 1997 onwards but a distributor was not appointed until five months after the relevant date, the 31 January 2001. References to websites, advertisements in magazines and trade fairs all related to those based in America.

On the basis of the information before him, the Hearing Officer concluded that any use of the mark KISS ME by the opponent in the UK had been less than de minimis. This being the case the opponent failed at the outset in the ground under Section 5(4)(a) since it clearly had no reputation in the mark in the UK at the relevant date.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o13404.html