BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Robert Benjamin Franks (Patent) [2005] UKIntelP o02705 (28 January 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o02705.html Cite as: [2005] UKIntelP o2705, [2005] UKIntelP o02705 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o02705
Summary
The application relates to a method for providing a user of an electronic trademark filing system with an indication of the costs associated with the various options (territories, classes etc) they have selected. The calculation is carried out in real time such that the user is able to see immediately the cost implications when changes are made to any of those options. In refusing the application as a method of doing business, a computer program and a mental act, the application was found to lie squarely in the field of business. Moreover it was considered to be a computerisation using conventional programming techniques of a previously mental process that could be performed using pen and paper.
The hearing officer also explored a number of matters of principle which were raised. The approach of the UK courts in Fujitsu takes precedence over more recent EPO decisions. There is no substantial difference in what is patentable between the EPO and the UK. The TRIPS treaty is not directly effective and has not changed what is considered patentable in the UK.
