BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> NTT Communications corporation (Patent) [2005] UKIntelP o19505 (13 July 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o19505.html
Cite as: [2005] UKIntelP o19505

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


NTT Communications corporation [2005] UKIntelP o19505 (13 July 2005)

For the whole decision click here: o19505

Patent decision

BL number
O/195/05
Concerning rights in
GB0309208.7
Hearing Officer
Mr S Probert
Decision date
13 July 2005
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
NTT Communications corporation
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 Section 1(2)(c)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention concerned a system for recognising music in radio broadcasts, and generating a 'playlist' from the results. A second group of claims concerned a system for recognising a commercial (advertisement) in a TV or radio broadcast. In both cases, the recognition is performed, and the playlist generated, 'in real-time'. Furthermore, in the first instance, the invention operates over a network such that broadcasts in a number of areas can be monitored, and a single playlist generated at a central location.

The Hearing Officer concluded that the first group of claims related to a program for a computer as such. He found that the second group of claims related to a method for performing a mental act and a program for a computer as such. In both instances, the Hearing Officer was unable to identify a technical contribution. Neither did he accept that the program in either situation was controlling or carrying out a technical process (per Vicom).

The Hearing Officer accepted that neither group of claims related to a method of doing business. He also agreed that the first group of claims did not relate to a method for performing a mental act, particularly in view of the distributed nature of the invention - i.e. the fact that it 'listens' to broadcasts in a plurality of areas simultaneously.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o19505.html