BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Fair, Isaac and Company, Incorporated (Patent) [2005] UKIntelP o32905 (20 December 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o32905.html
Cite as: [2005] UKIntelP o32905

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Fair, Isaac and Company, Incorporated [2005] UKIntelP o32905 (20 December 2005)

For the whole decision click here: o32905

Patent decision

BL number
O/329/05
Concerning rights in
GB 0308726.9
Hearing Officer
Mr A Bartlett
Decision date
20 December 2005
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Fair, Isaac and Company, Incorporated
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 section 1
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

In an online transaction, security procedures often require a user to be asked a number of questions so as to prevent fraud. Increasing the number of questions asked brings added security, but also brings with it a risk that the customer will lose patience and give up before a transaction is completed. The application is concerned with providing a mechanism for deciding the questions to be put to potential customers to strike the optimum balance between security and customer friendliness.

In refusing the application, The Hearing Officer concluded that the advance resided in the particular way the system determined the information to be requested from a potential customer. This advance was felt to be in an excluded field as being a scheme, rule or method for doing business.

The Hearing Officer further considered that in substance, the claimed invention was a computer program. In accordance with the CFPH judgment computer programs should not be foreclosed to the public and therefore the present application was also excluded as a program for a computer.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o32905.html