BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Withers Rogers v Jon Henry Dobson (Patent) [2006] UKIntelP o33106 (23 November 2006) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o33106.html Cite as: [2006] UKIntelP o33106 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o33106
Summary
Withers & Rogers, a firm of patent attorneys, applied for the revocation of Mr Dobson’s patent on behalf of an anonymous client. The grounds were that the invention was not patentable because it lacked an inventive step having regard to certain prior art, notably patent number US5347765 and an alleged marketing brochure from a company called Joran Bor A/S. The invention relates to an elongate mortar raking tool coated with diamond grit for use with an angle grinder.
The claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the publication date of the non-patent citation, though the obviousness of the invention in the event that the citation’s date had been proven was considered.
The hearing officer found the patent to be inventive over the cited prior art and dismissed the application for revocation.
