BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Keith Dixon Roche; Oil Gas Installations Limited; and Pipeflex Limited v NV Kakaert SA; Luc Bourgois; Ludo Adriaensen; and Daniel Mauer (Patent) [2006] UKIntelP o36606 (14 December 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o36606.html
Cite as: [2006] UKIntelP o36606

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Keith Dixon Roche; Oil Gas Installations Limited; and Pipeflex Limited v NV Kakaert SA; Luc Bourgois; Ludo Adriaensen; and Daniel Mauer [2006] UKIntelP o36606 (14 December 2006)

For the whole decision click here: o36606

Patent decision

BL number
O/366/06
Concerning rights in
EP 1350049
Hearing Officer
Mr D J Barford
Decision date
14 December 2006
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Keith Dixon Roche; Oil & Gas Installations Limited; and Pipeflex Limited v NV Kakaert SA; Luc Bourgois; Ludo Adriaensen; and Daniel Mauer
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 sections 13, 37,
Keywords
Entitlement, Inventorship, Jurisdiction, Stay of proceedings
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The claimants have launched entitlement proceedings in Belgium (where the defendants are based) with a view to the court there determining the entitlement issue in respect of all the European patent family members. In case the court in Belgium decides that it does not have the necessary jurisdiction, the claimants have also initiated entitlement actions in the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy in respect of corresponding equivalents.

All parties have requested a stay -referring to European Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction, However the hearing officer was content to order a stay, pending decision by the court in Belgium, simply on the basis that there is no dispute over a stay and there is no public interest consideration to take into account.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o36606.html