BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> BACTIGUARD (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2007] UKIntelP o09507 (2 April 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o09507.html
Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o9507, [2007] UKIntelP o09507

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


BACTIGUARD (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2007] UKIntelP o09507 (2 April 2007)

For the whole decision click here: o09507

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/095/07
Decision date
2 April 2007
Hearing officer
Dr L Cullen
Mark
BACTIGUARD
Classes
01, 05, 10
Registered Proprietor
Trade Mark Ad Tech Holdings Limited
Applicants for Revocation
Fenchurch Environmental Group Limited
Application for Revocation
Section 46(1)(a)

Result

Application for revocation, Section 46(1)(a): Successful.

Points Of Interest

Summary

As a result of previous decisions in the Registry (see BL O/300/04) and by the Appointed Person (see BL O/236/05). This matter had been remitted to the Registry for a decision on the substantive matters. The Hearing Officer had to decide on two issues (i) should a pre-existing agreement between the parties prevent this revocation action from proceeding and (ii) should the revocation action succeed on the basis of the evidence provided? The Hearing Officer decided, on the first point, that a restraint of the revocation action “would extend beyond any legitimate interest of the registered proprietor at the time that the delimitation agreement was entered into ……” On the second point the Hearing Officer concluded from the evidence that the registered proprietor had not been able to show genuine use of the mark during the relevant period.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o09507.html