BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Robert Vincent Backhouse (Patent) [2008] UKIntelP o04908 (20 February 2008) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2008/o04908.html Cite as: [2008] UKIntelP o04908, [2008] UKIntelP o4908 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o04908
Summary
The applicant applied for reinstatement after being informed by the Office on 9 May 2007 that his patent application had been treated as refused for failure to reply to an examination report of 30 June 2003. Refusing the application, the hearing officer held (i) that the application for reinstatement had been filed within the time limit prescribed by rule 36A (ie two months from the date of removal of the cause of non-compliance, this being regarded as the date when the applicant received the Office’s subsequent letter of 24 July 2007 advising him what he had to do in order to proceed); but (ii) the failure to reply was not unintentional as required by section 20A(2). The applicant’s allegation that he never received the examination report was contradicted by an e-mail of 13 January 2004 in which he said that he was preparing a response to the report and was aware of the time limit of 9 August 2004 for reply. In the absence of any convincing explanation, the hearing officer held that on the balance of probabilities the applicant was aware of the need to reply by the due date but had decided not to bother.
