BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Freshorize Limited, Malton Inflight Limited (Patent) [2009] UKIntelP o39609 (21 December 2009) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2009/o39609.html Cite as: [2009] UKIntelP o39609 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o39609
Summary
The Hearing Officer found that revocation of the patent was not in the public interest. The applicant for revocation had withdrawn the application and the Hearing Officer considered the Proprietor’s response and examiner’s observations based on the original application. The invention as defined by the claims was found to be novel and to involve an inventive step.