BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Q Software Global Limited (Patent) [2011] UKIntelP o12011 (29 March 2011)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2011/o12011.html
Cite as: [2011] UKIntelP o12011

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Q Software Global Limited [2011] UKIntelP o12011 (29 March 2011)

For the whole decision click here: o12011

Patent decision

BL number
O/120/11
Concerning rights in
GB 0617836.2
Hearing Officer
Miss J Pullen
Decision date
29 March 2011
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Q Software Global Limited
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 Section 1(2)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The application relates to a security system for preventing unauthorized users from gaining access to computer programs and data sources. The system uses a set of templates defined by business role or job function, one or more of which can be assigned to any user to define their access rights. When more than one template is assigned to a user, their security rules can conflict. Conflicting rules can be identified and altered if necessary. The Hearing Officer applied the Aerotel/Macrossan test, as modified by Symbian, and decided that the contribution made by the invention fell solely within excluded matter. She also concluded that the contribution did not have a relevant technical effect. The application was refused as being a program for a computer as such.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2011/o12011.html