BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o30312 (6 August 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o30312.html
Cite as: [2012] UKIntelP o30312

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o30312 (6 August 2012)

Patent decision

BL number
O/303/12
Concerning rights in
GB1005621.6
Hearing Officer
Dr J E Porter
Decision date
6 August 2012
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 Section 1(2)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention concerns language-based interaction with a virtual pet. It involves processing natural language input from a user and then obtaining the language characteristics of either the user himself or the pet owner who owns the virtual pet to be chatted with. A response from the pet is generated in natural language, based upon the input, the language characteristics of the user or the owner of the pet to be chatted with, and stored knowledge.

The hearing officer followed the steps set out in Aerotel in order to determine whether the invention was excluded from patentability. Having rejected arguments that the contribution lay in a new system or new configuration of hardware and software, he found that the contribution lay in software which provided better user interaction with a virtual pet, by enabling a user to chat with either their own pet or someone else’s, and by generating responses to the user which reflected the language characteristics of the user or pet owner of the pet to be chatted with. Having considered the AT&T/CVON signposts, he found that this was not a contribution that was technical in nature. The application was refused.


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o30312


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o30312.html