BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> WMS Gaming Inc (Patent) [2013] UKIntelP o19813 (14 May 2013)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2013/o19813.html
Cite as: [2013] UKIntelP o19813

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


WMS Gaming Inc (Patent) [2013] UKIntelP o19813 (14 May 2013)

Patent decision

BL number
O/198/13
Concerning rights in
GB 1103866.8
Hearing Officer
Mrs S E Chalmers
Decision date
14 May 2013
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
WMS Gaming Inc
Provisions discussed
PA 1977, Section 1(2)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention relates to the creation of wagering games. It works by providing a development computer which is operable to break down a wagering game into various parts (“widgets”) and output a game logic widget, a presentation engine widget and an aesthetic assets widget. The wagering game editor operating on a user’s computer is able, under the control of a user, to allow the user to select widgets from various widget palettes. The editor is then able to determine if a selected presentation engine widget is compatible with a selected aesthetic assets widget and also determine if a selected presentation widget is compatible with a selected game logic widget. If both comparisons are positive, then the widgets are assembled into a wagering game and transmitted back to the development computer and can be made available to the devices of other users. The game developer can thus use the creativity of the user community to create new games.

The Hearing Officer applied the four step test set out in Aerotel/Macrossan in the light of the Symbian, AT&T and Halliburton judgments. She found the invention as claimed was excluded under Section 1(2) because it related solely to excluded matter, namely to a computer program and a business method as such. The application was refused.


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o19813


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2013/o19813.html