BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Lookout, Inc. (Patent) [2021] UKIntelP o70121 (28 September 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2021/o70121.html
Cite as: [2021] UKIntelP o70121

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Patent decision

BL number
O/701/21
Concerning rights in
GB1511914.2
Hearing Officer
Mr B Buchanan
Decision date
24 September 2021
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Lookout, Inc.
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 section 1(2)(c)
Keywords
Excluded fields (allowed)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The claimed invention relates to a method and system for authorising user access to a network resource. This is achieved by implementing multi-factor authentication including sending an authorisation request to a second user to authorise the first user-™s access request. The authorisation request is sent to a separate device, associated with the second user. The examiner considered the apparatus and authentication means to be conventional and objected to the invention consisting of a program for a computer and/or a method for doing business. The applicant argued, among other things, that the use of multiple physical devices to enable authorisation gave rise to a technical contribution.

The Hearing Officer followed the four stepAerotel/Macrossantest to determine whether there was a technical contribution and considered theAT&T(HTC/Apple)signposts.The identified contribution to the field of access-control was found to include elements ensuring the independence of the second user authorisation, by using a second authorising device associated with the second user and separate authentication of the second user. This was deemed to provide the required technical effect and the application was remitted to the examiner for final processing.

Full decisionO/701/21 PDF document 351Kb


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2021/o70121.html