BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> JA-K v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA) (DLA, AA, MA: general - age conditions) [2017] UKUT 420 (AAC) (13 October 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/420.html Cite as: [2018] WLR 2657, [2017] WLR(D) 757, [2018] 1 WLR 2657, [2017] UKUT 420 (AAC) |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Buy ICLR report: [2018] 1 WLR 2657] [View ICLR summary: [2017] WLR(D) 757] [Help]
JA-K v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA) (DLA, AA, MA: general - age conditions) [2017] UKUT 420 (AAC) (13 October 2017)
validity of regulations introducing severe visual impairment route of entitlement to hmrc not covering those aged 65 or over at date of introduction of regulations -“ application of section 149(1) of the Equality Act 2010 and Human Rights Act 1998 -“ whether section 113 of Equality Act 2010 ousts appellate jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal to rule on Equality Act challenges - what remedies (if any) open in respect of the challenged regulations.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 420.pdf
