BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Kirkham v Information Commissioner (Record of Proceedings) (Tribunal procedure and practice - statements of reasons) [2020] UKUT 336 (AAC) (20 November 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/336.html Cite as: [2020] UKUT 336 (AAC) |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Kirkham v Information Commissioner (Record of Proceedings) [2020] UKUT 336 (AAC) (20 November 2020)
Tribunal practice and procedure - whether the Upper Tribunal is bound by the High Court's decision in R (McIntyre) v Parole Board [2013] EWHC 1969 (Admin)("McIntyre") that a judge's notes of a hearing (except to the extent that they amount to the record of proceedings) are "absolutely confidential" - whether the principles set out in McIntyre apply to tribunal proceedings.A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 336 (AAC)
