BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Martin-Clark v Information Commissioner's Office & Anor (Information rights - Freedom of information - absolute exemptions, Information rights) [2023] UKUT 245 (AAC) (3 October 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2023/245.html
Cite as: [2024] WLR(D) 21, [2024] 1 WLR 2709, [2023] UKUT 245 (AAC), [2024] WLR 2709

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Buy ICLR report: [2024] 1 WLR 2709] [View ICLR summary: [2024] WLR(D) 21] [Help]


Martin-Clark v (1) Information Commissioner's Office; (2) Homes for Haringey [2023] UKUT 245 (AAC) (3 October 2023)


In this case I consider whether, when faced with a document held by a public authority that contains substantial quantities of information which satisfy the criteria for one or more exemptions under the Freedom Of Information Act and which may contain information which does not qualify for any exemption, but which is considered likely to be `peripheral' only, the Information Commissioner (or the First-tier Tribunal standing in his shoes) is entitled to:

decline to carry out a granular analysis of the document to assess what information is exempt and what is not, if such an exercise would not be `proportionate'; and
treat the entire document as exempt.
In this decision I also discuss the discretion under section 50(4) Freedom Of Information Act not to specify any steps to be taken by a public authority even where that public authority has failed to comply with its duties under section 1(1) Freedom Of Information Act, and what amounts to `adequacy' when it comes to a tribunal's reasons in an information rights context.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2023] UKUT 245 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2023/245.html