BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) >> Revenue And Customs v AG Villodre SL [2016] UKUT 166 (TCC) (7 April 2016)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/TCC/2016/166.html
Cite as: [2016] UKUT 166 (TCC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Revenue And Customs v AG Villodre SL [2016] UKUT 166 (TCC) (7 April 2016)


Customs duty – Customs Community Code, Arts. 5, 221 - import of garlic declared to be of Indian origin – HMRC contended that garlic was of Chinese origin resulting in higher duty payable – post clearance demand for import duty – whether communicated to importer – whether posting letter sufficient communication if letter not received – whether communication to customs clearance agent sufficient – whether time limit for communication of 3 years pursuant to Art. 221(3) - whether arguable that HMRC could rely on Art. 221(4) of Community Customs Code to override time limit where alleged criminal act – permission to HMRC to amend pleading

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 166.pdf

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/TCC/2016/166.html