BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> GJD Travel Associates / Peregrination v Customs & Excise [2004] UKVAT V18454 (06 January 2004) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2003/V18454.html Cite as: [2004] UKVAT V18454 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
GJD Travel Associates / Peregrination v Customs & Excise [2004] UKVAT V18454 (06 January 2004)
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/03/484
GJD TRAVEL ASSOCIATES/PEREGRINATION Appellant
- and -
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: Mr R Barlow
Sitting in public at Manchester on 18 November 2003
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 5 June 2003 in the sum of £730.70 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Mr G Dykes for the Appellant and Mr B Haley of the Solicitor's office of HM Customs and Excise for the Respondents
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal
And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed and that there is to be a direction, by agreement, that the Respondents shall pay £100 costs to the Appellant
RICHARD BARLOW
CHAIRMAN
Released:
©CROWN COPYRIGHT 2003