Webb v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18594 (19 April 2004)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Webb v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18594 (19 April 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18594.html
Cite as: [2004] UKVAT V18594

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Webb v Customs and Excise [2004] UK V18594 (19 April 2004)

     

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2002/1135

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    MRS LINDSAY WEBB Appellant

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents

    Tribunal: MISS J C GORT (Chairman)

    MISS S O'NEILL

    Sitting in public in Bristol on 26 February 2004

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Mr K Webb, Consultant on behalf of the Appellant and Mr J Holl, Senior Officer, on behalf of the Respondents

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT there is a reasonable excuse for the Appellant's late payment in respect of periods 11/01 and 05/02

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is ALLOWED

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    J C GORT

    Chairman

    Release Date:

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2004


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18594.html