BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Wheels (Grimsby) Ltd v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V19039 (22 March 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19039.html Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19039 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
19039
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/2004/0705
WHEELS (GRIMSBY) LTD Appellant
- and -
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: Michael Johnson
Sitting in public in York on 2 March 2005
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to the imposition of a default surcharge and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 (as amended) ("the rules") coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing George Petch, director of the Appellant, for the Appellant and Bernard Haley, of the Solicitor's office of H M Customs and Excise, for the Respondents
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to rule 30(8) of the rules that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant was reasonably entitled to expect that the value added tax payable by it in respect of its accounting period 07/04 would reach the Respondents within the extended period of seven days after the due date conceded in this case by the Respondents and that accordingly a reasonable excuse for the default has been made out
And this tribunal accordingly directs that this appeal is allowed and that the Appellant shall not be liable to the surcharge under appeal.
MICHAEL JOHNSON
CHAIRMAN
RELEASE DATE: 22 March 2005
©CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005