BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> MA Rees & Son Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19093 (26 May 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19093.html Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19093 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
MA Rees & Son Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19093 (26 May 2005)
19093
LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2004/0990
Copy sent to:
Appellant/Applicant
Respondents
- and -
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal: MR MALCOLM J. F. PALMER (Chairman)
MRS J. M. NEILL ACA
Sitting in public in London on 21 April 2005
under Rule 30(8)
THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to Default Surcharges of £6,658, £3,598 and £40,054 for the periods ended 30 June 2003, 30 September 2003 and 31 December 2003 respectively being reasonable excuse appeals as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
AND UPON HEARING Mr M Birch, Managing Director for WGC Limited and Mr. P. Webb for the Respondent
AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representative(s) stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rule 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules
THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT it is satisfied that the Appellant had a reasonable excuse for the defaults for the quarters ended 30 June 2003 and 30 September 2003, but that it is not satisfied that there was any reasonable excuse for the default for the period ended 31 December 2003 nor for any of the defaults material to the default surcharges for any period before the period ended 30 June 2003
AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is allowed in part
AND that there is to be no direction as to costs