BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Sharara Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19271 (27 September 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19271.html
Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19271

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

Sharara Ltd v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19271 (27 September 2005)

     

    19271

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/05/469

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    SHAHARA LIMITED T/A UZZAL Appellant

    - and -

    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: JOHN F AVERY JONES CBE (Chairman)

    SHEILA WONG CHONG FRICS

    Sitting in public in London on 21 September 2005

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Mr A Hamid for the Appellant and Mr J Holl for the Respondent

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal under Rule 26(2) and having announced its decision

    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT as a cash business the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the late payment of tax in the periods 11/04 and 2/05

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED

    THE Tribunal expresses the hope that the Respondent will give the Appellant time to pay the surcharge

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    John F Avery Jones

    Chairman

    Release Date: 27 September 2005

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19271.html