BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Media-Cat Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19709 (02 February 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19709.html
Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19709

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    Media-Cat Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19709 (02 February 2006)
    19709
    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/05/1080
    Copy sent to:
    Appellant/Applicant
    Respondents
    MEDIA-CAT LIMITED Appellant
    - and -
    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
    Tribunal: MR M TILDESLEY OBE (Chairman)
    MRS E M MACLEOD CIPM
    Sitting in public in London on 1 February 2006
    DIRECTION
    under Rule 30(8)
    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
    AND UPON HEARING Pauline Crinnion, Advocate for HM Revenue and Customs and Lee Bowden, Director of the Appellant company
    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules
    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT the Appellant company does not have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal namely £1,499.99 issued on 17 June 2005
    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED
    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs
    M TILDESLEY OBE
    Chairman
    Release Date: 2 February 2006
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19709.html