BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> M White Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19820 (17 October 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19820.html
Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19820

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

M White Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19820 (17 October 2006)

     

    19820

    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/903

    M WHITE LIMITED Appellant

    and

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR

    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal Chairman: DAVID DEMACK

    Sitting in public in Manchester on the 12 October 2006

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 16 September 2005 in the sum of £1,965.11 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    And upon hearing Mr J White for the Appellant and Mr R Mansell of the Solicitor's office for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents

    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    This tribunal finds that the Appellant did despatch the VAT shown on its return for period 07/05 at such a time and in such a manner that it was reasonable to expect that it would be received by the Respondents by close of business on 31 August 2005

    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed

    And that there is to be no direction as to costs

    DAVID DEMACK
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date: 17 October 2006
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19820.html