BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Datsum Personnel v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19958 (04 December 2006) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19958.html Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19958 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
19958
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/06/0565
Appellant
DATUM PERSONNEL
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR
HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
David S Porter Tribunal Chairman:
Sitting in public in Manchester on 29 November 2006
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessments dated the:
26 October 2004, 2 February 2005, 25 March 2005, 8 August 2005, 29 November 2005 in the sums of £470.10, £569.40, £393,00, £550.05 and £1,021.48 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Mrs K Tilling of the Solicitor's office for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents and no one appearing for the Appellant
And this tribunal having heard this appeal under rule 26(2) of the said Rules and having announced its decision
And the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal
And this tribunal directs that this appeal is dismissed and that there is to be no direction as to costs
David S Porter
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 4 December 2006
CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006